Early Charter Arms Undercover Revolver. Early Charter Arms Grip Medallion.

charter arms undercover serial numbers

Charter Arms Undercover Revolver. The company went through several name and address changes. The early guns the first or so did not display an address on the right side of the barrel, being marked only in capital sans-serif characters:. The early guns had a grip-medallion with a sketch of an oak tree at least through serial number Starting in , the guns, made in Bridgeport, Connecticut, were marked on the right side of the barrel in all capital sans-serif characters:.

Doug McClennahan moved the company to a newly-built plant in Stratford, Connecticut in April of Guns made in Stratford were marked on the right side of the barrel:.

On 15 December , due to health problems, Doug McClennahan retired and sold his share of the company to Dave Ecker. Ecker assumed the position of Chairman of the Board, as well as President. Around the company was acquired by its vice president of finance, Jeff Williams, renamed Charco Charter Arms Company , and moved to Ansonia, Connecticut. Apparently, quality control was not good in Charco, and the company had to close its doors in Nick Ecker and two other investors bought the company and reopened it in , under the name Charter in Shelton, Connecticut.

By Ecker had become sole owner, and in renamed the company Charter Arms again. The guns made since have had good quality control, and the company has regained its earlier reputation for quality and reliability. The Charter Arms revolver utilizes an investment-cast one-piece frame with no side plate.

The trigger guard and grip frame are a separate piece made of aluminum alloy to save weight. The ejector rod is also aluminum. All other parts on the original Undercover revolver are made of steel.

1. What are the years to avoid in Charter Arms revolvers? - The Firing Line Forums.
2. .
3. .
4. speed dating 60+ nyc!
5. matchmaking temple kyoto!

To my knowledge no one has ever commented on the similarity between the Charter revolvers and the early High Standard Sentinel. There are certainly design differences but the two guns have similar one-piece frames and a nearly identical number of parts. The original Sentinel uses an integral one-piece alloy frame, while the Undercover has a steel frame with a separate trigger guard and grip made of alloy.

The Sentinel has a true hammer block that moves out of the way when the trigger is pulled, whereas the Charter has a transfer bar. The Ruger double action revolvers also have some interesting similarities with the Charter Arms. The Charter revolvers have two frame sizes, which I will arbitrarily refer to as small and medium, though they are nearly identical when put side-by-side.

The small frame was used for the original 5-shot Undercover. The medium frame was used for the. According to George C. The recess for the cylinder was increased by 0. These are very small differences. The Charter Arms revolver was first listed in Gun Digest for please note that Gun Digest is written and copyrighted the year before the date on the cover. I will quote the two short paragraphs:. New on the market this year are two 38 Special revolvers produced by Charter Arms Corp. The Undercover 2 is a 5-shot 16 oz.

Either can be had with interchangeable round or square butt smooth walnut grips. Features include chrome-moly frames and swing-out cylinders; single-stroke ejection, wide trigger and hammer spur. Built-in hammer block prevents accidental discharge. Looks like a three incher, the only drawback is the grips are kind of small, but it's not too much of a probem in a.

Anyone know where i could find some different grips? Not sure why you would not buy a used SW??? Generally the first ones from the 's were considered decent. The rest are sketchy at best. I also keep a Charter Undercover on my headboard, and another strategically hidden in the house. They work just fine. The Charco guns are not very good, and I have no experience with the newest models. As stated, if the gun doesn't have an ejector shroud, and it isn't a Charco-the guns are just fine.

BTW- Charter oversized "bulldog" grips can be found on Ebay. Stratford are the best ones. I've got a stainless one, Undercover 38, I've had for many years. And it's kept in readness at all times. But I've seen the other factories that made them and they were made poorly.

April 28, , The model 15 is a 38 special, you would be looking for a model 17 to be a K I've one of the newest, with over rounds of Speer gr Gold Dots through it so far. It still shoots as it did when new with good lockup and more than acceptable accuracy.

• Charter Arms Research.
• Charter Arms - Wikipedia.
• Navigation menu.
• .

The coward dies a thousand times, the brave only once. That's about all it takes, ain't it? Find More Posts by aarondhgraham. I've owned three of the earlier ones, 1 38 Special and 2 44 Specials. All dis-assembled themselves to one degree or another with regular shooting. I've personally seen several of the "Charco" guns shoot off the barrel shroud. I would avoid all of them but that's just an opinion.

I've a Bulldog Pug, made in Stratford around or Bought new in Many thousands of factory rounds and reloads through it. Still tight, looks like new, and shoots straight. The finish is really nice. I did have a smith smooth out the trigger a bit years ago and it now has a really nice double action pull.



• dating someone with dpd!
• expat dating brittany!
• dating site prague!

Single action has always been sweet. The latter mfg pre Charco guns were spotty. The Charco guns were generally shoddy. The Charter guns seem OK. Charter Arms were originally marketed as economical SD guns, what I call "underwear drawer guns" where you buy it, shoot a half a box, and stick it in the underwear drawer until a home threat arrises.

charter arms undercover 38 special serial numbers

I've typically had good luck with the pre Charco guns. Here's some information from a thread on another board that I had bookmarked: I have or have read magazine articles that cover pretty much of the production life of the 1st Generation, and during that period around late , early it seems that CA attempted to capture more of the market by doing so, also in April of , they introduced Stainless Steel revolvers into the mix, for the first time.

This is simply my studied opinion based upon experience. I have two Stratford guns: The Target Bulldog has a tendency to keyhole lead bullets after shooting them for a short while leads up. My wife likes this pistol and keeps it loaded with. The Undercover has always grouped well, just not to point of aim. I recently "bubba'd" the sights to get it to shoot them and find myself carrying it quite a bit more now.

The Bulldog has never failed to fire a round. The Undercover developed some light hits during double action shooting; replacing the mainspring cured that FWIW, the spring that was in it did not look stock. I like both guns. So, does anybody have one of the new ones with a range report opinion?

All times are GMT The time now is Forum Home Page - Archive - Top. Page 1 of 3. October 12, Posts: Find More Posts by nfafan. October 29, Posts: Find More Posts by skeeter. August 15, Posts: Find More Posts by mega twin. October 20, Location: Find More Posts by Coastal. April 27, Location: